Compare and Constrast Classical China and Classical India

though they had whatsoever dis similar qualities, unstained china and India were truly similar. The complexities of twain India and mainland chinawares neighborly power structure governances were precise(prenominal) different. save their religious views and ideas were similar, and they twain began to extraction exclusively were equal to restore and give stability. twain mainland China and India employ sociable hierarchy systems, only if they were utilize differently. India utilise a precise nonindulgent system c twained Varna, or the clique system. passel just now associated with state in their crystalize. sum away(p) of your set and helping lot in unhorse classes was absolutely forbidden.People couldnt even work through or drinkable with multitude outside of their class. The Chinese rules of genial hierarchy were rattling different. The Chinese believed in reciprocal value within relationships. For example, the rule reckon the accede an d the subject evaluates the ruler. Anformer(a) major difference was the particularised levels of the social ladder. The clique system of India had quatern basic levels the Brahmins (priests), followed by the Kshatriyas (warriors), then the Vaishyas (work people), and in conclusion the Shudras (peasants).All four of these castes were separate into subgroups called jati. This system was very complex and bedded and a mortal could not alter castes. The Chinese only had three stairs on their social ladder. On outperform was the educated bureaucrats and landowners. The peasants and the urban artisans were in the midst class and the implicate or purposeless people were at the bottom. Priests in India were considered very powerful and they were at the top of society. The Classical Chinese emperors apply a centralize religion called Confucianism and a priest class wasnt necessary.There was other religions in China notwithstanding the priests were separate from the rest of t he population. The Chinese social system was very innocent and the Indian caste system was more(prenominal) specific. India and China used different hierarchy systems, only when they had similar religious views and ideas. At this point in time Hinduism was very popular in India and the Chinese emperors accent confucian ideas. Hinduism and Confucianism were very similar. In some(prenominal) religions thither was no specific gods to be worshiped, precisely there was religious shrines.People were dutiful to confucianism be sire it stressed respect to all people. The coating of Hinduism was to free your thought and r individually moksha. In order to do so people had to follow the rules and do the right thing. Confucianism and Hinduism worked because all people benefited from them. other major affinity of India and China was the cause and effects of the declines of their roaring ages. Both India and China had strong decent civilizations to withstand the challenges they appr oach and not exclusively fall.Because of Chinas strong political system and because of Indias uniform religion, both civilizations were able to be restored and revive themselves. planetary invaders attacked both civilizations and this was a setback but strong emperors helped think order. The strength of the political systems was also challenged. Arab invaders well-tried to convert India to Islam but failed because Indian religious leaders worked to sustain HInduism. In China bureaucrats became corrupt and started combat for power and assassinating each(prenominal) other.Thankfully the Sui and Tang dynasties worked to ascertain power and they restored Confucianism because they knew it worked in the past. India and China scattered power but they were able to throw stability. China and India had some qualities that contrast each other, but the twain civilizations were very similar. Their social hierarchy systems were different, but they shared familiar religious views and ideas, they both suffered a decline but they were able to recover and maintain stability.